Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
emz
Senior Member
Joined: 25 November 2006
Location: Christchurch
Points: 5321
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 29 July 2011 at 11:03pm |
I agree with Bizzy, I don't get it. I've been both a SAHM and working mum. The only times my kids have been in DC are when I'm working. I have a 19m gap between my kids, and 2nd was a reflux baby so it wasn't easy going. 'Me' time and housework time, for me, are after 7 when the kids are in bed. My husband was gone 10 1/2 months of the last year so I taught 50 hours then came home and had the kids all weekend by myself - that's what mums do, we choose not to lounge around all the time.
BUT if you have the money to spend, and you want to make life a bit easier, then go for it. All I'm saying, is that you DO get me time after the kids go to bed, you DO get your housework done, and you DO find time for each child. Also, your child doesn't need daycare to socialise or learn social skills at such a young age, I think that's a thing mothers have made up to justify daycare.
Up to you, I just don't think it's a necessity and many people I know waste a lot of money that could be put to better use to put their kids in daycare when it's not necessary. If I was a SAHM, I'd wait until the child was kindy age and take advantage of that (and no, daycare and kindy are not the same).
|
 |
kiwisj
Senior Member
Joined: 02 June 2008
Points: 2434
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 30 July 2011 at 2:40am |
I am just about to start DS1 at kindy in a couple of weeks time when term starts here. I've only gone back to work on weekends (casual) since DS1 was born so it hasn't been a necessity. We always planned on DS1 starting kindy at 3, which for him would mean waiting till mid Jan because he's a December bub. We've brought it forward more because of timing with the school year here, but the main reason is that now that DS2 is mobile and getting into everything, I feel like he's not getting anywhere near the one-on-one time DS1 got at the same stage. He generally just tags along to whatever we're doing with the big kids which is great but not always easy on him. This way DS1 will be engaged and having a grand old time at kindy and DS2 will get some chill out time with just mum!
Ditch the guilt and do what works for YOUR family. Funnily enough, it's the opposite here - people have been asking me when DS is starting daycare since he was about 18 months old. Personally, I couldn't see the value in paying someone else to supervise him playing when I can do that myself for nothing  now that he's kindy age, I'm happy for him to go. But everyone's situation is different. If it gives you a chance ti recharge your batteries a couple of mornings a week in late pregnancy and time to bond with #2 when they arrive then it sounds worthwhile to me
|
SJ
Callum - Dec 2008
Daniel - Oct 2010
|
 |
MrsEmma
Senior Member
Joined: 19 March 2009
Points: 2769
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 30 July 2011 at 4:37am |
[QUOTE=emz] All I'm saying, is that you DO get me time after the kids go to bed, you DO get your housework done, and you DO find time for each child. Also, your child doesn't need daycare to socialise or learn social skills at such a young age [QUOTE=emz]
I 100% agree with this, my free time is when the kids are both asleep and when DH is home on the weekends and I can pop out for an hour or so. But that's what I signed up for and expected as a SAHM.
I would rather use surplus funds to have someone come and do my housework so I don't have to!
Grrr, stupid phone doesn't quote properly
Edited by MrsEmma
|
|
 |
T_Rex
Senior Member
Joined: 07 March 2007
Location: PN
Points: 2896
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 30 July 2011 at 8:20am |
Haha, yes, great idea MrsEmma - pay someone else to do the housework and keep the childminding jobs for yourself
Emz, I agree that toddlers don't *need* the socialisation etc people seem to think can only be acheived by sending them to daycare. My girl's been in care 3-4 days a week since 6 months and while she's a chirpy, confident wee girl, I'm sure she'd have been like that regardless of daycare. She's very like me, and I never spent a day in care.
But I think the best advice given here is to do what works for your family and never mind anyone else's opinion. I'm sure there are people who don't agree with my parenting choices, but you know what? I don't give a damn. I've made the choices that are right for me and that's what's important
|
|
 |
Hopes
Senior Member
Joined: 06 August 2008
Location: Waikato
Points: 4495
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 30 July 2011 at 8:25am |
I'm tempted to do this - Jacob is in creche two days a week, and he LOVES it. I think it will be a lot for him to handle, having such a change to his routine, not to mention a new little being at home to deal with (I'm hoping since he'll only be 16 months, he'll be a little too little to be too jealous, but still imagine it will be a change). He's a baby, and he's a pretty chilled little fellow, so I don't have any guilt it's likely to do him life damamge or anything, but I still want to make the transitition from one to two as easy as I can for him.
On the other hand, it all comes down to money - and there are plenty of other things I could use it on. I'm leaving the decision for later for now
|
|
 |
catisla
Senior Member
Joined: 17 February 2008
Points: 2604
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 30 July 2011 at 9:00am |
|
|
 |
AuntieSarah
Senior Member
Joined: 19 April 2007
Location: Hastings
Points: 1442
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 30 July 2011 at 12:39pm |
Everyone is different and every child is different. Six months ago I would've said no, ds is great at entertaining himself, we'll be fine. Now I have a 2.5 year old who has just dropped his naps and really needs more stimulation than I can provide when my attention is taken up by a 3 month old with reflux who doesn't sleep well at all.
Having ds at his nana's one day a week and just started kindy 2 mornings a week means I can spend time and attention on ds2, get housework etc done while ds1 isn't here and then when he is here I can give him the attention he needs.
It depends on your definition of what is a necessity too, my sanity is a necessity I think!
I guess no mother of the year award for me for admitting I need some help and some time out from my toddler
|
|
 |
MrsEmma
Senior Member
Joined: 19 March 2009
Points: 2769
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 30 July 2011 at 1:02pm |
Agreed also T-Rex, everyone is different - what's good for the goose isn't always what's good for the gander
|
|
 |
clover
Senior Member
Joined: 21 July 2008
Points: 2090
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 30 July 2011 at 2:03pm |
I'm in the camp of not understanding it when you're a stay at home mum, however also agree that it's whatever suits your family. Personally I'd rather look after my son myself and spend the money on something else.
|
|
 |
Peanut
Senior Member
Joined: 01 January 1900
Location: Christchurch
Points: 3649
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 30 July 2011 at 5:43pm |
Hmm, My DS1 went to daycare full time at 14 months when I went back to work. When #2 arrived I continued to keep #1 at daycare fulltime until the new baby was 6 weeks old. I loved having this time with my new baby and it was great as the routine never changed for him at all. After that 6 weeks, he moved up to the over 2's and I dropped his hours to 2 days a week. When #2 was 6 months old I returned to work for a half day so put #2 in for a full day so I had half a day on my own. It was awesome!.
The boys now go fulltime again as I am back working.
My kids love daycare and they will both continue to go in some capacity regardless of what I do work wise. I have no guilt, my kids love it, we can afford it and at the end of the day it works for us.
I also pay someone to clean my house ;-)
|
|
 |
TheKelly
Senior Member
Joined: 30 March 2010
Points: 12728
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 30 July 2011 at 6:19pm |
My youngest two have 20months between them,Ty is now 2 and full on and Mila is 5 months and I am a SAHM.
I often think it would be good to put Ty in daycare for a day or so each week,but I keep him at home,we do activities go to Playgroup etc,but somedays I think it would be beneficial for both of us.
I couldn't give a monkeysbutt if people don't agree with it cos im a SAHM,I would do it if I wasn't worried about Ty's lack of speech and the cost of Daycare.
If YOU feel that it would be beneficial to you,your baby and your toddler,then I say go for it,don't worry about what anyone else says,you do what you need to do to make your family happy cos thats who this is about.
Some SAHMs prefer to keep their children at home,some like a break for a day,neither is wrong,each way is right for each individual family.
|
|
 |
fire_engine
Senior Member
Joined: 03 November 2007
Points: 6260
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 30 July 2011 at 8:48pm |
TheKelly wrote:
If YOU feel that it would be beneficial to you,your baby and your toddler,then I say go for it,don't worry about what anyone else says,you do what you need to do to make your family happy cos thats who this is about.
Some SAHMs prefer to keep their children at home,some like a break for a day,neither is wrong,each way is right for each individual family. |
and
T_Rex wrote:
But I think the best advice given here is to do what works for your family and never mind anyone else's opinion. I'm sure there are people who don't agree with my parenting choices, but you know what? I don't give a damn. I've made the choices that are right for me and that's what's important  |
There are no rules. Everyone has to do what works for them. As long as your child is loved, fed, cuddled and occasionally washed  , do what you need to do. I'm a better mum for having time out. DS1 kept doing to daycare after DS2 was born and it worked for everyone involved. Don't regret it at all. Just cos you're a SAHM doesn't mean you can't negotiate the conditions
Edited by fire_engine
|
Mum to two wee boys
|
 |
kiwigal
Senior Member
Joined: 01 January 1900
Points: 1616
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 30 July 2011 at 11:04pm |
I agree and disagree on this one. We chose to be SAHM and that means taking care of your child and not being looked after by somebody else and put the money towards better use for the family but on the other side I can understand why some SAHM's need a break because of their family situation.
I went back to work part time as a nanny I got ask back after I was there for 2 years then left to have my son. When my son was 21 months and a month later we found out he was autistic then a month later my employer had to resigned from her job I could easily drop my son out of daycare as we were paying a lot of money every week then on the other side he needed to continue to learn how to be around other people and stayed until he started school. He is now 8.5 and loves being around other kids/adults.
DD is almost 3 and probably start looking at kindys soon.
|
 |
Delli
Senior Member
Joined: 12 September 2008
Location: BOP
Points: 747
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 31 July 2011 at 8:32am |
Not sure why some people insist that their job description of a SAHP should be the same for everyone. Not that too many people have done that here though, so not accusing anyone of anything
Am just amused when I see someone say things like - this is what a SAHP is, they choose to stay home so this is what they should do. Oh yeah? According to who? The big boss of SAHP's? Is that job description in your contract when you sign up to be a SAHP? The Great Rule Book of SAHP decrees that it must be done just so otherwise you Will Damage Your Child? And you definitely CANNOT tailor the SAHP job to suit the individual. No, that would be Bad Parenting.
Anyway, to the topic at hand - sorry for that tangent OP! We didn't put Jude in daycare when Willem was born but that's because of a number of things, the main one relevant to you is probably that we have family around willing to take him off our hands for a bit every now and again. Another reason was that we live rurally and getting Jude to daycare just seems like more effort than it's worth - if it's meant to be a break for me but I end up having to get everyone organized in the morning and then spend around an hour and a half plus out of my day driving to and from daycare, it doesn't end up being much of a break.
Meh, I'm no matyr. If I had a self cleaning house and some sort of babysitter (one that appeared and disappeared on command and I didn't have to pay them or feed them or have them living in my house) that could attend to the children when I cant be buggered, that'd be awesome. While we're on that train of thought, throw in a cook as well please.
Anyway, not sure what this post was meant to be other than a ranting and raving one.
As others have said - do what you like, do what is right for you.
|
|
 |
Hopes
Senior Member
Joined: 06 August 2008
Location: Waikato
Points: 4495
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 31 July 2011 at 10:32am |
|
|
 |