New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Tummy time for baby?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login


Forum LockedTummy time for baby?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12
Author
T_Rex View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 07 March 2007
Location: PN
Points: 2896
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote T_Rex Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 November 2011 at 6:45pm
thanks mrsmc, makes sense
Back to Top
Anna W. View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 10 October 2011
Location: Whangarei
Points: 23
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Anna W. Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 November 2011 at 6:55pm
Hey, great to see all your comments and opinions on this issue - I didn't expect so many responses!
I definitely agree that we need to get back to the basic stuff - more time on floor for baby, (whichever position) instead of all the equipment that we use these days. As someone mentioned, if baby is only happy for a minute or two on their tummy, then go with that. As parents, you should have access to all the information out in the community,then you can make your own decisions on what feels right for you and your baby. Go for it!   
Tired parents? Unsettled young baby? Difficulties with feeding? Click here to get FREE tips and advice on my blog
Back to Top
whipersnapper View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 21 November 2011
Points: 9
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote whipersnapper Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 November 2011 at 10:24pm
babies 1-4 had tummy time, hated it, didn't do it much.
babies 5 and 6 (twins) had no tummy time whatsoever because of information provided by a SPACE (playcentre baby classes) co-ordinater. according to space theory, babies should not be put in positions they cannot acheive themselves. This includes sitting up propped and on tummy. babies should develop in this order....laying on back, rolling on to front, roling back, getting up on kness, pushing themselves back inot a sitting position, crawling, standing up, walking.
I followed this advice, my twins developed perfectly normally, and at the same rate as my other children, without the extra added discomfort of forced tummy time.
I would advise looking into it...interesting topic.
Back to Top
Bizzy View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 01 January 1900
Location: New Zealand
Points: 10974
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Bizzy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 November 2011 at 3:18pm
Oh i so agree about babies not being forced into positions. I hate bumbos and exercausers - which are really only walkers without wheels. it feels sometimes like we are in too much of a hurry to get babies to grow up.

Back to Top
JessDub View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 29 February 2008
Location: Hamilton
Points: 323
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote JessDub Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24 November 2011 at 7:31am
DS2 has had tummy time approx 5 times in his short life. At nearly 4 months old I put him on his tummy yesterday and he was head and chest up, quite ably and comfortably, which shows to me that he didn't actually need tummy time to get where he is now.

Back to Top
snugglebug View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 24 June 2009
Location: North Shore
Points: 2146
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote snugglebug Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25 November 2011 at 9:07am
Just to throw a spanner in the works, DS had a lot of floor and tummy time, and he rolled by 6 weeks, crawled at 5 months, steps at 9.5 months and walking properly at 10 months. I think all the time he spent on the floor exploring helped with this. I didn't force anything, he did these things himself because he had the opportunity to. He didn't always like tummy time at first so as soon as he got upset, I picked him up, but gradually that time increased and he loved it. I fully believe in it. Each to their own.
Me 28, DH 29
DS born 20 Nov 2010 (4 years old)
#2 due October 7
Back to Top
MrsMc View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 27 September 2009
Points: 169
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote MrsMc Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25 November 2011 at 12:14pm
Originally posted by wiggly_jiggly wiggly_jiggly wrote:

Just to throw a spanner in the works, DS had a lot of floor and tummy time, and he rolled by 6 weeks, crawled at 5 months, steps at 9.5 months and walking properly at 10 months. I think all the time he spent on the floor exploring helped with this. I didn't force anything, he did these things himself because he had the opportunity to. He didn't always like tummy time at first so as soon as he got upset, I picked him up, but gradually that time increased and he loved it. I fully believe in it. Each to their own.


I also know babies who have rolled at 6wks, crawled before 6 months and didn't have tummy time until they rolled there, how early babies develop is built into them and i don't think it has anything to do with tummy time or not.

The idea of natural development is that they do things when they and their bodies are ready be that at 6weeks, 6 months or later

ETA I just re read and sound a bit snarky, its not intended that way

Edited by MrsMc
Back to Top
Shelt View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 17 May 2008
Location: Tauranga
Points: 1181
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Shelt Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 November 2011 at 8:21pm
Originally posted by MrsMc MrsMc wrote:

Originally posted by wiggly_jiggly wiggly_jiggly wrote:

Just to throw a spanner in the works, DS had a lot of floor and tummy time, and he rolled by 6 weeks, crawled at 5 months, steps at 9.5 months and walking properly at 10 months. I think all the time he spent on the floor exploring helped with this. I didn't force anything, he did these things himself because he had the opportunity to. He didn't always like tummy time at first so as soon as he got upset, I picked him up, but gradually that time increased and he loved it. I fully believe in it. Each to their own.


I also know babies who have rolled at 6wks, crawled before 6 months and didn't have tummy time until they rolled there, how early babies develop is built into them and i don't think it has anything to do with tummy time or not.

The idea of natural development is that they do things when they and their bodies are ready be that at 6weeks, 6 months or later



Lol and my DD had lots of tummy time and it took her 4.5 months to learn to hold her head up. She rolled once at 8 months, crawled at 13 months and walked at 17 months! If I had gone for the natural development way of doing things she wouldn't have done anything other than lay on her back for a very very long time! I agree that babies development seems to be built in to them. Some kids seem wired for early movement and some dont. My daughter would have loved to move a lot earlier than she did, she tried and tried and did a lot of screaming at her toys coz they were too far away - none of that helped her move any closer till her arms and legs decided they were ready
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 11.10
Copyright ©2001-2017 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.500 seconds.