Print Page | Close Window

Kinda Weird and Creepy....

Printed From: OHbaby!
Category: General Chat
Forum Name: General Chat
Forum Description: For mums, dads, parents-to-be, grandparents, friends -- you name it! And you name the topic you want to chat about!
URL: https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17530
Printed Date: 27 August 2025 at 4:22am
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.10 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: Kinda Weird and Creepy....
Posted By: Shezamumof3
Subject: Kinda Weird and Creepy....
Date Posted: 23 May 2008 at 12:50pm
Read this...

http://www.nbc10.com/news/16364150/detail.html

What would you do if someone left you a card asking this?

-------------




Replies:
Posted By: nikkitheknitter
Date Posted: 23 May 2008 at 12:57pm
I think that is terribly rude.

Maybe if they had gotten into a discussion with her whereby she expressed an intention to adopt out her child. But otherwise... potentially traumatic for the pregnant woman.


Posted By: MrsMojo
Date Posted: 23 May 2008 at 1:00pm
OMG. "They haven't had any negative response from handing out cards." So they've handed out several?!

I think it's so presumptious of them to assume that a pregnant waitress may want/need to adopt out a baby (IMO it assumes that she isn't in a steady relationship and that the pregnancy is unplanned or unwanted). If I were her I'd be very angry.

But then at the same time I really feel for this couple who are obviously very desperate to have a child of their own.

I think it's sad that abortion is encouraged instead of adoption nowadays and people who can't have their own children are driven to try desperate measures to find a baby for adoption while others can nonchalantly get knocked up and terminate. Then again I don't want to live in a "get pregnant just to sell the baby to the highest bidder" kind of world either.

-------------


Posted By: AliaDawn
Date Posted: 23 May 2008 at 1:07pm
How creepy... why can't they just go through adopting a kid the right way???

-------------



Posted By: nikkitheknitter
Date Posted: 23 May 2008 at 1:07pm
Originally posted by MrsMojo MrsMojo wrote:


I think it's sad that abortion is encouraged instead of adoption nowadays


I have never, ever, heard abortion encouraged instead of adoption.

Sorry, but that really distresses me.


Posted By: cuppatea
Date Posted: 23 May 2008 at 1:15pm
You should read australian cosmo then cos they pretty much promote abortion as a form of contraceptive, its totally disgusting and the reason I stopped by their mag.

But back to the topic, its a bit presumptious to assume that just because someone is a waitress they are having a baby they didn't plan or want.

-------------



Posted By: MrsMojo
Date Posted: 23 May 2008 at 1:21pm
Originally posted by nikkiwhyte nikkiwhyte wrote:


I have never, ever, heard abortion encouraged instead of adoption.

Sorry, but that really distresses me.


When my little sis (who was 17) got pregnant I took her to family planning to have her HPT confirmed and when she got BFP there the first thing the woman suggested was abortion as if at 17yo my sis had no other options.

Mind you that was 8.5 years ago and just one woman so I guess 'encouraged' isn't the right word to use although the point I was trying to get across is that it does seem that many women who have unplanned pregnancies use abortion instead of adoption.

Eta: My sis has a beautiful nearly 8yo daughter now.

p.s. no need to apologise, I still love you (but disagree with me again and it's over )

-------------


Posted By: nikkitheknitter
Date Posted: 23 May 2008 at 1:24pm
I did use abortion instead of adoption so I TOTALLY get that. I didn't think I could deal with the thought that my "baby" was out there and I had abandoned her. I felt that terminating when I did was more of an elimination of the "what if"

Family planning's official line is not to encourage one over the other but to present options. I have talked with the Chief Exec on this quite a bit.





Posted By: MrsMojo
Date Posted: 23 May 2008 at 1:27pm
Originally posted by nikkiwhyte nikkiwhyte wrote:

Family planning's official line is not to encourage one over the other but to present options.


Unfortunately the companies official line and what individual staff members promote are not always the same.

-------------


Posted By: nikkitheknitter
Date Posted: 23 May 2008 at 1:30pm
Originally posted by MrrsMojo MrrsMojo wrote:

p.s. no need to apologise, I still love you (but disagree with me again and it's over )


heeeehehehehe

And yes, I agree that sometimes the company line doesn't filter down.

Excuse me for jumping to FP's defence... I'm just never gonna let go of that place


Posted By: MummyFreckle
Date Posted: 23 May 2008 at 1:34pm

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/topic/story.cfm?c_id=1500906&objectid=10510244 - http://www.nzherald.co.nz/topic/story.cfm?c_id=1500906&objectid=10510244

Thought this might add to the conversation.

 



-------------
http://lilypie.com"> http://lilypie.com">


Posted By: caraMel
Date Posted: 23 May 2008 at 1:43pm
Hmm, I think that is a really risky thing to do, to assume that a young pregnant woman would be interested in adopting her child to you. So many women could be really offended by that. It is really heartbreaking that the couple are that desperate though.


RE: Abortion promotion
When I was first pregnant with Ella I went to an A&E to get the pregnancy confirmed and was given a long talk about the process of termination because I said that the pregnancy was unplanned.
Then when I went for the dating scan a few days later the sonographer took me aside on my way to the toilet afterward and gave me a similar talk.
I think both people were just trying to make me feel unjudged if I were thinking about it, which is great IMO (although not so great when I was absolutely bursting for a wee after the scan!), but it is a little sad that no one said a word to me about the possibility of adoption as an alternative at all because I imagine that it is just as scary to come to terms with the idea of that as it is to be considering termination.

-------------
Mel, Mummy to E: 6, B: 4 and:



Posted By: nikkitheknitter
Date Posted: 23 May 2008 at 1:46pm
I had the opposite.

When I was pregnant with Hannah I considered termination my first option and was given more information on adoption and keeping the kiddo than the other way around.


Posted By: MrsMojo
Date Posted: 23 May 2008 at 1:46pm
Thanks for the link SimSam. Being pro-life (incase you hadn't already figured that one out for yourselves) I'm really pleased to see adoption being actively encouraged as an alternative.

-------------


Posted By: MrsMojo
Date Posted: 23 May 2008 at 1:50pm
It's good to hear that other options where discussed when you were preg too Nikki.

I think there's probably been a bit of a turnaround in recent years.

I remember a friend of a friend wanting to adopt about 5 years ago and at the time the stats were that only 20 children had been up for adoption the previous year (though not sure if that was the official stat or just a figure they plucked from thin air).

-------------


Posted By: nikkitheknitter
Date Posted: 23 May 2008 at 2:01pm
20 seems awfully low but I do know that the number of adoptions has definitely been decreasing.

As the article has said, the increase in social welfare and ease of access to terminations.

I consider the access to terminations a good thing but not the increase in number. I would prefer it if there were no unplanned pregnancies in the first place! I know that I would have suffered a whoooole lot less trauma if I had been able to choose the timing of my pregnancy. That'll teach me for having sex huh?.... or not.

ETA "the timing of"


Posted By: Jay_R
Date Posted: 23 May 2008 at 2:05pm
Actually, it was 9 adoptions in 2006... not sure about last year.

My mum is the Team Leader for Adoption Services in the Central Region.



Posted By: nikkitheknitter
Date Posted: 23 May 2008 at 2:10pm
Woah really? That low??


Posted By: Jay_R
Date Posted: 23 May 2008 at 2:16pm
Yep.


Shocking to think that there were almost 18,000 abortions for the same year.




Posted By: nikkitheknitter
Date Posted: 23 May 2008 at 2:24pm
How come from the article linked above there is a quote saying 87?

    
Originally posted by wrote:

Christchurch GP Dr Hilary Cleland said women with crisis pregnancies were stressed and termination seemed like a quick solution to their situation at the time.

"With only 87 (adoptions) happening in 2006, there's going to be a huge surplus of potential adoptive families out there. A lot of them would be great parents."


Posted By: MrsMojo
Date Posted: 23 May 2008 at 2:24pm
OMG that is shocking. Especially with nearly 400 couples on the waiting list and how many others that have given up on the idea completely as they know the adoption numbers are so low so they don't end up going on a waiting list at all.

-------------


Posted By: Maya
Date Posted: 23 May 2008 at 2:39pm
Nikki - the discrepancy could probably be that some adoptions are privately arranged or "whangai" arrangements? I'm not sure.



-------------
Maya Grace (28/02/03)
(02/01/06)
The Gremlins:Sienna Marie & Mercedes Kailah (14/10/06)
Lil miss:Chiara Louise Chloe (09/07/08)
Her ladyship:Rosalia Sophie Anais (18/06/12)


Posted By: nikkitheknitter
Date Posted: 23 May 2008 at 2:43pm
Yeah, I just decided that was probably the case


Posted By: scarecrowfarm
Date Posted: 23 May 2008 at 2:58pm
I was wondering whether the 9 adoptions was just the central region.

Back to the original post however. I was wondering whether the couple just randomly left cards everywhere so that people would pass them on. If the woman was 5 months pregnant they may not have realised she was pregnant and it may not have been targetted specifically at her. At 5 months, many women haven't quite hit the ballooning phase of pregnancy.

-------------
Robyn
www.scarecrowfarm.co.nz


Posted By: Shezamumof3
Date Posted: 23 May 2008 at 3:06pm
Good Point Scarecrowfarm.


-------------



Posted By: busymum
Date Posted: 23 May 2008 at 7:32pm
That's exactly what I was thinking. Heaps of people advertise in baby magazines etc for adoption or more commonly, egg donation. I guess that couple were just leaving as many cards around as possible so that someone might know someone, and that's all they meant by it.

I am totally shocked at the abortion vs adoption stats!! Everything I've heard from or of people in FP etc tells me that they give a lot of "both sides" advice. However I think among the general public, abortion is still more commonly accepted because it has a firmer "end" to it, to the biological parents. They don't have to acknowledge or birth or even tell family members, etc

-------------


Posted By: caitlynsmygirl
Date Posted: 23 May 2008 at 7:41pm
Originally posted by busymum busymum wrote:

. They don't have to acknowledge or birth or even tell family members, etc


I had an abortion when i was 18 and I acknowledge it , and live with my guilt everyday.
I admire people who give up their babies for adoption so much, i was just not strong enough to do it -it wasnt the birth that worried me , it was the handing the baby i had grown over to someone else that i was scared of.


As for the waitress-bet she just wanted a tip :-P


Posted By: lizzle
Date Posted: 23 May 2008 at 7:46pm
i think for those with an unplanned pregnancy, the thought of another 7-8 months of having their "mistake" in their face is terrifying - whereas having a termination is over and done with. do you get me?


Posted By: caitlynsmygirl
Date Posted: 23 May 2008 at 7:50pm
yeah personally i get you -but i can also say from my own experience (as in it mightnt be the case for everyone) that a termination is physically over and done with , but isnt ever emotionally over and done with .
Of course i didnt know that at the time, the main reason for me was i was too selfish to adopt .

Tho anyone would be terrified having their mistake in their face-you would look ridiculous! looks much better in your belly


Posted By: MrsMojo
Date Posted: 23 May 2008 at 7:53pm
My sis was asked recently why she's pro-life and she responded that she'd had been offered terminations in her first tri with Elizabeth and her 2nd tri with Joshua and had she aceepted them her life now would be empty and that's why she's pro life.

We lovingly refer to the kids fathers as "the sperm donors"

-------------


Posted By: caitlynsmygirl
Date Posted: 23 May 2008 at 7:58pm
Im very glad now that if it came to it and i got pregnant i wouldn't have to choose, i could keep it , i just wont have as many as the Duggar family ....though it could be quite fun , choosing a letter and naming them all ......ANYWAY , one good thing that came out of my termination was when i got pregnant with Caitlyn a year later ( I never learn :-P ) i knew i never wanted to terminate again and if anything it gave me the courage to stand up to everyone who was opposed to me keeping her ...
You know my uncle offered to pay for a private abortion when i was 20weeks (and not for my sake-for the family name) it took all the restraint i had not to tell him to eff off -only cos i was trying to prove i was "mature" ....

sorry , long post


Posted By: MrsMojo
Date Posted: 23 May 2008 at 8:00pm
good on you Kelly. It just goes to show that often wonderful things can come from negative experiences

-------------


Posted By: caitlynsmygirl
Date Posted: 23 May 2008 at 8:09pm
ahhh tis true tis true

you wanna know something freaky and weird ? i had my termination on the 8th of June 2000 , and Caitlyn was born on the 8th of June 2002 .......


Posted By: MrsMojo
Date Posted: 23 May 2008 at 8:13pm
Wow do you believe in souls returning?

Talking about date coincidences we started TTCing 1 year to the day Michaela was born.

-------------


Posted By: caitlynsmygirl
Date Posted: 23 May 2008 at 8:56pm
Originally posted by MrsMojo MrsMojo wrote:

Wow do you believe in souls returning?

Talking about date coincidences we started TTCing 1 year to the day Michaela was born.


oooh I dont know- i hadnt really thought of that, i preferred to think of the baby up in Heaven where he/she (but i decided it was a he ) was getting the love that if i had been a stronger , less selfish person he would have got on earth ....

But thats an interesting thought....and weird about your TTCing a year to the day Michaela was born .....


Posted By: Rachael21
Date Posted: 23 May 2008 at 10:48pm
When I was 19 with an unplanned baby the dr didn't even mention not keeping it, she was so excited it was kinda weird.

Also you have to think a termination is a lot less risky than a pregnancy IYGWIM not to sound mean or anything but there are a lot of risks (and discomforts) to go with pregnancy that I don't think I could put myself through just to hand the baby over. I think anyway who has had a termination has some form of guilt over it so why make them feel even worse by going on about how they should all be adopting them out.


Posted By: caliandjack
Date Posted: 23 May 2008 at 11:20pm
Originally posted by scarecrowfarm scarecrowfarm wrote:

Back to the original post however. I was wondering whether the couple just randomly left cards everywhere so that people would pass them on. If the woman was 5 months pregnant they may not have realised she was pregnant and it may not have been targetted specifically at her. At 5 months, many women haven't quite hit the ballooning phase of pregnancy.


That makes it even worse, don't people know by now to never ever assume a women is pregnant unless she is almost about to pop or she's actually told you.
I've been asked on more than one occassion when my baby was due, i'm fat not pregnant.!!


Posted By: caliandjack
Date Posted: 23 May 2008 at 11:26pm
As for the adoption vs abortion debate,
I think deciding whether to keep your baby or is a very personal and individual choice and can only be made by the mother.
Quite frankly I don't think its anyone else's business.


Posted By: Rachael21
Date Posted: 23 May 2008 at 11:31pm
Originally posted by fleury fleury wrote:

As for the adoption vs abortion debate,
I think deciding whether to keep your baby or is a very personal and individual choice and can only be made by the mother.
Quite frankly I don't think its anyone else's business.


Well said


Posted By: susieq
Date Posted: 23 May 2008 at 11:35pm
But Caitlyns same great uncle now thinks she is the bees knees I know that


Posted By: scarecrowfarm
Date Posted: 24 May 2008 at 9:23am
Originally posted by fleury fleury wrote:

Originally posted by scarecrowfarm scarecrowfarm wrote:

Back to the original post however. I was wondering whether the couple just randomly left cards everywhere so that people would pass them on. If the woman was 5 months pregnant they may not have realised she was pregnant and it may not have been targetted specifically at her. At 5 months, many women haven't quite hit the ballooning phase of pregnancy.


That makes it even worse, don't people know by now to never ever assume a women is pregnant unless she is almost about to pop or she's actually told you.
I've been asked on more than one occassion when my baby was due, i'm fat not pregnant.!!


You misunderstood me. They might not have even known the waitress was pregnant and they may not have been targetting her. They may have simply been leaving the cards at random places for people to pick up and pass along to someone they know is pregnant. Just because that waitress was pregnant, doesn't necessarily assume they were referring to her baby. It could have just been an overreaction of an oversensitive pregnant woman thinking "gah, they want my baby".

-------------
Robyn
www.scarecrowfarm.co.nz


Posted By: MrsMojo
Date Posted: 24 May 2008 at 8:49pm
Originally posted by scarecrowfarm scarecrowfarm wrote:


You misunderstood me. They might not have even known the waitress was pregnant and they may not have been targetting her. They may have simply been leaving the cards at random places for people to pick up and pass along to someone they know is pregnant. Just because that waitress was pregnant, doesn't necessarily assume they were referring to her baby. It could have just been an overreaction of an oversensitive pregnant woman thinking "gah, they want my baby".


When I was pregnant there were a few cases of baby snatching when a heavily pregnant women was kidnapped, the baby cut out of her stomach and the woman left to die (in one case the womans 2yo alerted police as her mummy lay drugged and bleeding profusely - twas awful). Anyway I was deathly scared that someone would try and steal my baby straight from my womb

What I'm trying to say is, I agree... that's definitely a feasible reason - and pregnant women and overreactions do go hand in hand (well they did for me anyway).

-------------


Posted By: scarecrowfarm
Date Posted: 24 May 2008 at 9:03pm
Yeah, those stories were awful weren't they! I couldn't believe people would actually do things like that and I'm glad I haven't heard of cases like that in New Zealand. At the time I was dealing with fertility issues of my own and feeling super sensitive to preggie women, but I still couldn't understand how they could do that.

I agree though, pregnancy and oversensitivity do seem to go hand in hand. I'm preggie now so I can say that and hopefully get away with it.

-------------
Robyn
www.scarecrowfarm.co.nz


Posted By: Jay_R
Date Posted: 24 May 2008 at 11:51pm
Spoke to my mum to ensure my comment re the 9 adoptions was correct. And it was. Perhaps the others were private arrangements/whangai or something. Didn't include inter-country though, and there are quite a few of them each year

Although, just realised I didn't confirm that she meant NZ wide, and not just Central Region.

Sorry if i've stuffed that up.


Posted By: gypsynita
Date Posted: 25 May 2008 at 7:27am
assuming the couple DID know the waitress was pregnant (I had a very obvious bump at 5mo) - I think it's seriously wrong that they could even consider that someone would want to give up their baby. At 5mo it's highly likely she's not going to have an abortion so wouldn't you assume she wants the baby??

You've got to wonder why they're not going through the proper channels to adopt [:s]

-------------
Anita
Mum to Cian (Aug 08), Josh (Jun 10)

http://lilypie.com">


Posted By: Shezamumof3
Date Posted: 25 May 2008 at 9:31am
Yeah I looked preg at 5 months, Id be disgusted if someone handed me a card saying they wanted to adopt my baby.
Id tel them where to get off, and to go and do it the proper way with a lady/gril that WANTS to give their child up for adoption, you dont just go and ask every pregnant women, its sick.

-------------



Posted By: Rachael21
Date Posted: 25 May 2008 at 1:13pm
I sure didn't look pregnant at 5 months.

Totally OT but did you know the leading cause of death for pregnant women (in USA of course) is murder.


Posted By: scarecrowfarm
Date Posted: 25 May 2008 at 1:20pm
I started looking seriously pregnant at about 5.5 months. Between 5 months and 5.5 months I seriously popped so I only had a small bump at 5 months and a lot of people didn't notice it. Also Some people classify themselves as 5 months pregnant at 20 weeks, although it's really only 4.5 months. At 20 weeks I was still having to tell most people I was preggers, and it was only the observant ones that noticed.

-------------
Robyn
www.scarecrowfarm.co.nz


Posted By: MrsMojo
Date Posted: 25 May 2008 at 4:53pm
I got huge really quickly and had people asking if I was pregnant at 8 weeks. I'm 5ft nothing and a size 8-10 though so there was nowhere for my baby to go but out.

-------------


Posted By: Mindi
Date Posted: 30 December 2011 at 4:08pm
Hi,    as the topic of abortion has been brought up here by others....

facts18,000 life's snuffed out IN NZ alone each yr at will of another the mother, or forced bu pressure of relatives very unfair,
aprox 400,000 and more have been aborted in NZ alone

Some believe its just about themselves, and how they feel? it is simply tricking yourself in think just having a abortion make things go away for you? most know thats not true, and others feel deeply for the lies the abortions push on to unsuspecting young and mostly scared victims, then there the dead babies most victimized.

10 weeks, Brains Hearst that beat and all potential make up there Denial can be a strong drug if you feel just because you cannot see it physically. but you can still feel it 100%.

Also not all babies fathered had bad fathers, some time girls / woman make mistake yes, but should be held accountable and grow up taking care of what they have been one part of created a human life, what about allowing fathers to father is this not their choice in NZ it is? and just think of the chance you give your own flesh and blood to be a potentially productive human being. Surely better to give a life a chance?

I applaud those who have made mistakes and learned about the facts of life the hard way by causal sex or just aborting unwanted babies/ potential children, who has not made mistakes in life or wrong or   bad choices? but for the ones that do not care to take proper precautions and treat sex as just recreation without the procreation responsibility don't understand that mind set, sorry cannot sympathize with that.

Life no mater how old, is not to be seen as a inconvenient thing, to be snuffed away at will. As all life is Sacred, sad for all who think they have the power to do so.

Some one once said " The most dangerous place can be in the Mothers womb, tend to agree with this, as the Embryo has not real choice over life or death.javascript:AddSmileyIcon('')




Posted By: Hopes
Date Posted: 30 December 2011 at 4:33pm
Yea, so this was a really old post... kind of weird to resurect it as your first OB post!! Forgive me if I'm wrong, but this smacks of 'troll' and even with relatively strong views on the topic I'm not bothering

-------------



Posted By: jazzy
Date Posted: 30 December 2011 at 6:12pm
Originally posted by Hopes Hopes wrote:

Yea, so this was a really old post... kind of weird to resurect it as your first OB post!! Forgive me if I'm wrong, but this smacks of 'troll' and even with relatively strong views on the topic I'm not bothering


She has also picked out another really old post & posted a long post...I have not read it as it goes on & on


Posted By: Hopes
Date Posted: 30 December 2011 at 6:23pm
Originally posted by jazzy jazzy wrote:

Originally posted by Hopes Hopes wrote:

Yea, so this was a really old post... kind of weird to resurect it as your first OB post!! Forgive me if I'm wrong, but this smacks of 'troll' and even with relatively strong views on the topic I'm not bothering


She has also picked out another really old post & posted a long post...I have not read it as it goes on & on


Wow... someone has kind of strong opinions!!!

-------------



Posted By: jazzy
Date Posted: 30 December 2011 at 6:28pm
very...don't get why you would get an old post & write so much & pick apart what has been said months ago...


Posted By: AzzaNZ
Date Posted: 30 December 2011 at 7:39pm
strong opinions and terrible grammar.

-------------
http://lilypie.com">
http://lilypie.com">

http://intermittentblogger.wordpress.com


Posted By: troutpout
Date Posted: 30 December 2011 at 9:20pm
Oh dear. I think a new troll is stalking.

-------------
http://lilypie.com" rel="nofollow"> http://lilypie.com" rel="nofollow">


Posted By: jazzy
Date Posted: 30 December 2011 at 11:25pm
Originally posted by troutpout troutpout wrote:

Oh dear. I think a new troll is stalking.


she is finding all the adoption threads...


Posted By: Hopes
Date Posted: 31 December 2011 at 8:50am
Looks like we've got our own unsolicited adoption expert (in need of grammar lessons).

I feel a bit mean, I know you've got strong opinions Mindi, it's just kind of weird to jump on and shout out about them without a little background first.

-------------



Posted By: HoneybunsMa
Date Posted: 31 December 2011 at 1:27pm
Originally posted by jazzy jazzy wrote:

very...don't get why you would get an old post & write so much & pick apart what has been said months ago...


Months ago? Try years!

-------------
http://www.myfitnesspal.com/weight-loss-ticker">



Posted By: jazzy
Date Posted: 31 December 2011 at 2:52pm
Originally posted by HoneybunsMa HoneybunsMa wrote:

Originally posted by jazzy jazzy wrote:

very...don't get why you would get an old post & write so much & pick apart what has been said months ago...


Months ago? Try years!


yip this one is...but check out the other one she is posting long long long posts in that one is a few months old...I think it is odd to bring back really old topics no one is using right now...she could of started a new topic if she wanted...& she was picking at what some had said in the other one...why??? who knows


Posted By: GuestGuest
Date Posted: 31 December 2011 at 4:04pm
Wow talk about kinda weird and creepy


Posted By: Georgiegirl
Date Posted: 31 December 2011 at 4:29pm
Sorry to go off topic again! But CONGRATS :LuckyRed I didn't realise you were UTD. EXCITING!!!!!!

Now I'll like the weird and creepy continue. LOL

-------------
http://www.fertilityfriend.com/home/279456">


TTC#2
8th round of clomid 100mg
1 failed IUI.
Waiting for IVF now.


Posted By: GuestGuest
Date Posted: 31 December 2011 at 4:38pm
Thanks GG


Posted By: jazzy
Date Posted: 31 December 2011 at 5:51pm
Originally posted by LuckyRed LuckyRed wrote:

Wow talk about kinda weird and creepy


you got that right


Posted By: AandCsmum
Date Posted: 01 January 2012 at 7:17pm
Eyebrows raising off the top of my head! When I couldn't get the link to work I then realised it was cause it was from years ago...skip to last page & Yep agree weird & creepy.

ETA: Congrats to Lucky red as well!

-------------
Kel
http://lilypie.com">

A = 01.02.04   &   C = 16.01.09   &   G = 30.03.12


Posted By: Raspberryjam
Date Posted: 02 January 2012 at 3:31pm
wow...if she is looking to make an impact - its a bad one - 2 very contraversial posts - I think you might want to find a different forum - we tend to try and support each other on here, not shove opinions down each others throats



-------------
http://lilypie.com]
http://lilypie.com]
http://lilypie.com]


Posted By: blondie_2010
Date Posted: 02 January 2012 at 7:16pm
Hmmmmm me thinks someone is using a fake profile....very weird


Posted By: jazzy
Date Posted: 02 January 2012 at 7:40pm
Originally posted by Raspberryjam Raspberryjam wrote:

wow...if she is looking to make an impact - its a bad one - 2 very contraversial posts - I think you might want to find a different forum - we tend to try and support each other on here, not shove opinions down each others throats



you should of read her posts in the other thread...nothing compared to here


Posted By: blessedmama
Date Posted: 02 January 2012 at 8:17pm
I think I missed half the excitement in the other thread because I struggled to understand the message underneath the grammar! When I came back to it, it was gone.


Posted By: SeasideMama
Date Posted: 05 January 2012 at 9:41am
I've only seen what was written on this thread but it is quite common for pro-life people to be paid by the American pro-life movement to target blog posts etc with pro-life messages. I'm not sure if this person is american or not but a simple google search with particular terms probably brought this old thread up.

-------------
http://lilypie.com"> http://lilypie.com">


Posted By: Hopes
Date Posted: 05 January 2012 at 10:47am
I thought along very similar lines, SeasideMama - I didn't know about the American thing, but thought we had a raving pro-lifer on our hands. On the other thread, though, she seemed more focussed on adoption rather than being anti-abortion. One funny lady, whatever the case.

-------------



Posted By: AzzaNZ
Date Posted: 09 January 2012 at 3:07pm
Can someone translate that?

-------------
http://lilypie.com">
http://lilypie.com">

http://intermittentblogger.wordpress.com


Posted By: KeepOnSmiling
Date Posted: 09 January 2012 at 3:16pm
Would love to but I don't speak Mindilingo

-------------
http://www.TickerFactory.com/">



Posted By: GuestGuest
Date Posted: 09 January 2012 at 3:17pm
Translation: "I forgot to take my meds this morning"


Posted By: blessedmama
Date Posted: 09 January 2012 at 3:20pm
Mindi you seem to be accusing us of making assumptions when you seem to be making a lot yourself about the women who post on this site. If you have a look at the other threads on OhBaby you will see what a supportive lot these women are. I would kindly suggest that you have no idea what degree of humour or life experience the other posters here have because you haven't really taken the time to post and get to know people in a more gentle manner. I rarely post these days but I feel I have to jump in in defense of what I see as a largely supportive community of parents on this site.

I may be speaking out of turn but I think people are simply reacting to the fact that you seem to have very, very strong opinions that you are pushing upon us without knowing anything about us. I think we all cope relatively well with differing opinions as long as it is in the context of good, healthy debate rather than one person forcing their opinion and judgements on others.



Posted By: AzzaNZ
Date Posted: 09 January 2012 at 3:31pm
well said blessedmama

-------------
http://lilypie.com">
http://lilypie.com">

http://intermittentblogger.wordpress.com


Posted By: Plushie
Date Posted: 09 January 2012 at 4:19pm
Is ohbaby an r18 site? Goodness I had no idea, will make an effort to include more naked men in my posts.
No one worry, I've called ohbaby and their lawyers are looking into it.

Jokes.


Posted By: jaycee
Date Posted: 09 January 2012 at 4:54pm


-------------




Posted By: Hopes
Date Posted: 09 January 2012 at 5:21pm
Originally posted by Mindi Mindi wrote:

Be good Mothers look after your own family and children, and find some thing nice to say to someone, other than your self.


Oooh, I found something I can agree with!

Otherwise, hmmm....

-------------



Posted By: SethsMama
Date Posted: 09 January 2012 at 5:56pm
I've read it over about 3 times...I don't quite understand what the point is.

-------------
Lilypie Second Birthday tickers


Posted By: myonlineself
Date Posted: 09 January 2012 at 9:26pm
what the?? I'm with SethsMama, I have no idea

-------------
http://lilypie.com">
http://lilypie.com">


Posted By: troutpout
Date Posted: 09 January 2012 at 10:07pm
Oh crikey, this again?? My brain hurts.

-------------
http://lilypie.com" rel="nofollow"> http://lilypie.com" rel="nofollow">


Posted By: fattartsrock
Date Posted: 10 January 2012 at 6:15am
Three things:-
WTF is with the DEARS???
Don't forget to take your meds
And can you make sure you speak and write proper english before you post again? It's like you are using some kind of auto translate site, it is very hard to read and understand. WHat ever your point and opinion is - and you are entitled to have your own opinion, no matter how extreme it is - it kind of gets lost in the bad grammar/spelling/syntax etc.

-------------
The Honest Un PC Parent of 2, usually stuck in the naughty corner! :P


Posted By: Tiff8ny
Date Posted: 10 January 2012 at 1:06pm
I totally don't get this Mindi and what she is trying to say here! It makes no sense whatsoever!

Please Mindi stay away and leave all these lovely ladies to it. These forums have been and are a saviour to many! We do not need this kind of stuff happening when we all should be supporting each other and making friends!

-------------
Me 32, DH 30
TTC 4+ years
Unexplained Infertility
IVF#1 - Chem Pregnancy,no frosties
IVF#2 - BFP!!!! Plus 1 frostie



Posted By: Raspberryjam
Date Posted: 11 January 2012 at 6:29pm
looser

-------------
http://lilypie.com]
http://lilypie.com]
http://lilypie.com]


Posted By: jazzy
Date Posted: 11 January 2012 at 6:55pm
she is at it again...in another thread


Posted By: Tiff8ny
Date Posted: 11 January 2012 at 7:07pm
Which one this time?

-------------
Me 32, DH 30
TTC 4+ years
Unexplained Infertility
IVF#1 - Chem Pregnancy,no frosties
IVF#2 - BFP!!!! Plus 1 frostie



Posted By: jazzy
Date Posted: 11 January 2012 at 7:32pm
here she is

http://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=41301&KW=Mindi - this one


Posted By: LadyBee
Date Posted: 11 January 2012 at 7:33pm
http://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=41301&PN=1 - HERE My oh my she angry now LOL
Pity she edited her orignal post

-------------
TTC for 4 1/2 years
IVF #1 - April 2012 short BFP, no frosties
IVF #2 - August 2012, BFP!! 3 frosties!

http://lilypie.com" rel="nofollow">


Posted By: blessedmama
Date Posted: 11 January 2012 at 7:59pm
It's rather odd really. She seems like a pretty angry and / or sad person and the way she uses language does get in the way of interpreting what the message actually is.

I can't help but admit I'm finding it slightly entertaining but I'm also hoping no one has been upset or hurt by some of it!



Posted By: HoneybunsMa
Date Posted: 11 January 2012 at 9:02pm
Ooooh action! lol

love how she is attacking people for how many posts they have and we all know we talk alot when we have due in groups and in Hopes case I would imagine at least 2years as her son is now over one what a troll..

oooh popcorn is needed

-------------
http://www.myfitnesspal.com/weight-loss-ticker">



Posted By: HoneybunsMa
Date Posted: 11 January 2012 at 9:05pm
double post

-------------
http://www.myfitnesspal.com/weight-loss-ticker">



Posted By: Hopes
Date Posted: 11 January 2012 at 9:08pm
Originally posted by blessedmama blessedmama wrote:

I can't help but admit I'm finding it slightly entertaining but I'm also hoping no one has been upset or hurt by some of it!


Well, I have to be honest - even with the obvious trollishness of it all I did think for a moment 'heck, do I need to get a life here?' Then I took my sanity pill and worked out who needed the life.

-------------



Posted By: scarecrowfarm
Date Posted: 11 January 2012 at 9:18pm
Hopes, you looked like you were trying to help her, so her reaction to you was plain nasty. And if it helps I have a far higher post count than you on the main forum I frequent, and I still have a life too.

In fact I get regular comments from people wondering how I achieve as much as I do, so don't sweat it.

-------------
Robyn
www.scarecrowfarm.co.nz



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 11.10 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2017 Web Wiz Ltd. - https://www.webwiz.net