New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Amazing photo
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login


Forum LockedAmazing photo

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Flutterby View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 18 March 2008
Location: West Auckland
Points: 2627
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Flutterby Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Amazing photo
    Posted: 25 November 2010 at 9:17am
Got this via email and thought I would share it with you all.



A picture began circulating in November. It should be 'The Picture of the Year,' or perhaps, 'Picture of the Decade.' It won't be. In fact, unless you obtained a copy of the US paper which published it, you probably would never have seen it.

The picture is that of a 21-week-old unbor n baby named Samuel Alexander Armas, who is being operated on by surgeon named Joseph Bruner.

The baby was diagnosed with spina bifida and would not survive if removed from his mother's womb. Little Samuel's mother, Julie Armas, is an obstetrics nurse in Atlanta .... She knew of Dr Bruner's remarkable surgical procedure. Practicing at Vanderbilt University Medical Center in Nashville , he performs these special operations while the baby is still in the womb.

During the procedure, the doctor removes the uterus via C-section and makes a small incision to operate on the baby.   As Dr Bruner completed the surgery on Samuel, the little guy reached his tiny, but fully developed hand through the incision and firmly grasped the surgeon's finger. Dr Bruner was reported as saying that when his finger was grasped, it was the most emotional moment of his life, and that for an instant during the procedure he was just frozen, totally immobile.

The photograph captures this amazing event with perfect clarity. The editors titled the picture, 'Hand of Hope.' The text explaining the picture begins, 'The tiny hand of 21-week-old fetus Samuel Alexander Armas emerges from the mother's uterus to grasp the finger of Dr Joseph Bruner as if thanking the doctor for the gift of life.'
Little Samuel's mother said they 'wept for days' when they saw the picture. She said, 'The photo reminds us pregnancy isn't about disability or an illness, it's about a little person.' Samuel was born in perfect health, the operation 100 percent successful.

Now see the actual picture, and it is awesome....incredible....and hey, pass it on. The world needs to see this one!





Don't tell me our God isn't an awesome God!!!!!

Back to Top
Sponsored Links


Back to Top
Nothing View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 05 June 2009
Location: Nelson
Points: 1470
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Nothing Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25 November 2010 at 9:37am
This photo has been around for a long time, I dont think its true that it 'grasped' his hand ( I read somewhere).

Back to Top
Flutterby View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 18 March 2008
Location: West Auckland
Points: 2627
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Flutterby Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25 November 2010 at 9:45am
maybe not, but still looks really neat.
Back to Top
EmDee View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 01 January 1900
Location: Waikato
Points: 4407
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote EmDee Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25 November 2010 at 9:57am
Yes the photo is real (as in the surgery took place and the surgeon took the baby's hand), however as the surgeon explains in this link, the mum & baby were anesthetised (thank goodness, imagine doing surgery on a tiny baby without it!) so couldn't reach out and grab his hand. It is from 1999.

It doesn't take away from it being an amazing moment captured on film though.

edited for spelling

Edited by mummydee
DS 8
DD 6
DS 4
DD 2
Back to Top
Kazper View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 30 November 2008
Points: 3847
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Kazper Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25 November 2010 at 12:55pm
Awww even with the explanation given by the doctor, it is still so beautiful to see that tiny hand.

It is common practice now to operate on an unborn baby.






Back to Top
BriAndOlisMum View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 18 June 2009
Location: Mamaku, Rotorua
Points: 1726
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote BriAndOlisMum Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26 November 2010 at 9:22am
Originally posted by mummydee mummydee wrote:

Yes the photo is real (as in the surgery took place and the surgeon took the baby's hand), however as the surgeon explains in this link, the mum & baby were anesthetised (think goodness, imagine doing surgery on a tiny baby without it!) so couldn't reach out and grab his hand. It is from 1999.

It doesn't take away from it being an amazing moment captured on film though.


When I was reading the above story I was thinking how could it grab his finger, didn't they use anasthetic. I'm glad to hear that the baby couldn't actually feel the surgery.

Great photo tho.
Back to Top
LJsmum View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 13 June 2007
Location: Auckland
Points: 845
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote LJsmum Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26 November 2010 at 9:56am
wow that's an awesome story and photo. So cute!
So perfectly formed and made, beautiful.

So sad that perfectly healthy 20 plus week babies are aborted in the states.
Whereas here they are saving one.
Ironic isn't it
Back to Top
LittleBug View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 29 July 2007
Location: Dunedin
Points: 4277
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote LittleBug Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 November 2010 at 10:18am
Awesome pic! (Even though the description isn't accurate).
Chloe (4 years) and Oliver (3 years).
Back to Top
LittleBug View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 29 July 2007
Location: Dunedin
Points: 4277
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote LittleBug Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 November 2010 at 10:22am
LJsmum, speaking of abortion, I just put a link in the "In the news thread" about a couple that are having an online poll to decide whether or not they will abort their baby. She's 17 weeks pregnant now.
Chloe (4 years) and Oliver (3 years).
Back to Top
Hopes View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 06 August 2008
Location: Waikato
Points: 4495
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Hopes Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 November 2010 at 10:30am
Originally posted by LittleBug LittleBug wrote:

LJsmum, speaking of abortion, I just put a link in the "In the news thread" about a couple that are having an online poll to decide whether or not they will abort their baby. She's 17 weeks pregnant now.


Oooh, that is wrong on soooooooo many levels. I do sympathise with some people who have abortions at a later point like that, sometimes there are reasons that make me cry... but on online poll?! I think I actually just made a face like the little angry emoticon...

Back to Top
pikelets View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 08 April 2007
Location: Auckland
Points: 760
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote pikelets Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 November 2010 at 12:58pm
That must have been such a risky operation!

Especially to aneathetize (sp) the little baby and hope there isn't a reaction. Amazing!


3 Angels - Dec10 / Mar11 / Dec11
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 11.10
Copyright ©2001-2017 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 1.094 seconds.